[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0018395]: C should not receive request call again after C cancel if B blind transfer using atxfer call C
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Thu Dec 2 21:53:01 CST 2010
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18395
======================================================================
Reported By: shihchuan
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 18395
Category: Features
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: new
Asterisk Version: 1.8.0
JIRA:
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2010-11-29 04:31 CST
Last Modified: 2010-12-02 21:53 CST
======================================================================
Summary: C should not receive request call again after C
cancel if B blind transfer using atxfer call C
Description:
call limit of B is 2
1. A call B, B answered
2. B *97(atxfer) call C, C rining (no aswer)
3. B hangup
4. C cancel
5. B receive request call (It's ok)
call limit of B is 1
1. A call B, B answered
2. B *97(atxfer) call C, C rining (no aswer)
3. B hangup
4. C cancel call
5. C receive request call again, C ringing (behavior isn't reasonable)
6. C cancel call again
7. C receive request call again, C ringing (behavior isn't reasonable)
Because B reached call limit, C receive request call again.
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to 0017273 atxfer *2 channel dahdi FXS no hangup
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0129289) rmudgett (administrator) - 2010-12-02 21:53
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18395#c129289
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is intended for Party B to be called back if Party C does not answer if
atxferdropcall is no. It is also intended to bounce back and forth between
Party B and Party C for atxfercallbackretries times to try to get someone
to take the Party A call.
However, the call linked to Party B is not completely hung up yet during
the transfer. This is why Party B has reached its call limit and is a bug.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-12-02 21:53 rmudgett Note Added: 0129289
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list