[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0018397]: IAX2 CODEC_PRES wrong (offset error?)
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Wed Dec 1 10:28:07 CST 2010
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18397
======================================================================
Reported By: birgita
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 18397
Category: Channels/chan_iax2
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: new
Asterisk Version: SVN
JIRA:
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!): 296230
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2010-11-29 08:41 CST
Last Modified: 2010-12-01 10:28 CST
======================================================================
Summary: IAX2 CODEC_PRES wrong (offset error?)
Description:
On an incoming IAX2 call, the console reports (correctly):
Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
Timestamp: 00005ms SCall: 09646 DCall: 00000 [94.12.29.127:2705]
VERSION : 2
CODEC_PREFS : (gsm|ulaw)
FORMAT : 2
FORMAT2 : gsm
CAPABILITY : 6
CAPABILITY2 : unknown
ADSICPE : 2
However, Asterisk sends over the wire as value for CODEC_PREFS: "CD"
This is incorrect. It should be "BC":
A = "AUDIO_G723",
B = "AUDIO_GSM",
C = "AUDIO_ULAW",
D = "AUDIO_ALAW",
In this case codec negotiation does not fail because of FORMAT(2).
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0129236) birgita (reporter) - 2010-12-01 10:28
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18397#c129236
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks.
Would it be possible to add it to the RFC? I would be good to be able to
implement IAX2 based on the RFC only and not have to look at the Asterisk
implementation.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-12-01 10:28 birgita Note Added: 0129236
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list