[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0017934]: [patch] downsampling slinear16 to slinear (or ulaw or alaw or g729) results in truncation
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue Aug 31 14:17:09 CDT 2010
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17934
======================================================================
Reported By: palbrecht
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 17934
Category: Codecs/General
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: acknowledged
Asterisk Version: 1.6.2.11
JIRA: SWP-2136
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2010-08-31 13:33 CDT
Last Modified: 2010-08-31 14:17 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] downsampling slinear16 to slinear (or ulaw
or alaw or g729) results in truncation
Description:
When I translate from AST_FORMAT_SLINEAR16 to AST_FORMAT_SLINEAR the output
frame is truncated, specifically, instead of 160 samples I get 137 samples.
The result is the same for ulaw and alaw. For g729, the output is truncated
to 80 samples.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0126489) russell (administrator) - 2010-08-31 14:17
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17934#c126489
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wrote a small unit test module to test this out and was able to reproduce
it. The output frame has 137 samples every time.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-08-31 14:17 russell Note Added: 0126489
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list