[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0017823]: [patch] INVITE w Replaces on existing call? Refusing action

Asterisk Bug Tracker noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue Aug 10 20:43:29 CDT 2010


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17823 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                alecdavis
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   17823
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
JIRA:                        
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!): 281467 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2010-08-09 23:49 CDT
Last Modified:              2010-08-10 20:43 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] INVITE w Replaces on existing call? Refusing
action
Description: 
After a call has been picked up using directed pickup on an BLF button
('magic pickup' not the **extn method), we are unable to place the call on
Hold or to Transfer.

The call just gets dropped.
Asterisk sends "400 Bad request" to phone.

Hardware Grandstream GXP2000 and GXP2010 firmware 1.2.3.5


====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0125787) alecdavis (manager) - 2010-08-10 20:43
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17823#c125787 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
bug17823.diff.txt

Adopt the approach as stated in RFC 3891 
o  There are no adverse effects if the header is unsupported.

When on an existing call, treat an INVITE with 'replaces' as unsupported.
Don't issue '400 Bad Request' 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-08-10 20:43 alecdavis      Note Added: 0125787                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list