[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0015180]: [patch] No unique identifier for CDR

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15180 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                Nick_Lewis
Assigned To:                mnicholson
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   15180
Category:                   CDR/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:           1.6.1-beta1 
JIRA:                        
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-05-22 08:45 CDT
Last Modified:              2009-09-22 08:35 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] No unique identifier for CDR
Description: 
There is no unique identifier for a CDR. This makes it difficult to
associate other things such as call monitor recordings with a CDR. 
Each call does have a unique identifier which is stored in the CDR as
"uniqueid" but there may be multiple CDRs representing one call. For
example ResetCDR(w) saves a CDR and creates a new one for the call. Both
CDR have the same "uniqueid".
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0111153) lmadsen (administrator) - 2009-09-22 08:35
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15180#c111153 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Is there any update here? Was that post ever sent to the mailing list? If
so, I'd like someone to add a note with the link to the discussion
(lists.digium.com).

Or if someone knows that the discussion resulted in not wanting to move
this issue forward, then please close, or request to have it closed.

My question would be, "Why not just add an 'id' field and auto-increment?" 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-09-22 08:35 lmadsen        Note Added: 0111153                          
======================================================================