[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0015586]: [patch] Failure to negotiate T.38
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue Sep 15 13:52:41 CDT 2009
The issue 0015886 has been set as DUPLICATE OF the following issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15586
======================================================================
Reported By: globalnetinc
Assigned To: kpfleming
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 15586
Category: Channels/chan_sip/T.38
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: assigned
Asterisk Version: SVN
Regression: No
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-07-26 15:57 CDT
Last Modified: 2009-09-15 13:52 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Failure to negotiate T.38
Description:
To implement T.38 on most ATAs their is a reinvite required. In the
process of gatewaying the T.38 negotiations the Asterisk server is not
doing this correctly. On versions past 1.6.0.10 it does not even send the
same ports on the RTP streams to both parties.
Every version past 1.6.0.10 fails
1.6.0.11
1.6.1.0
1.6.1.1
1.6.2.0-rc
This also includes the new T.38 stack that is is being introduced. in the
SVN tree of 1.6.1.1 and 1.6.2.0
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
has duplicate 0015886 T38 udptl.c bufferoverflow
======================================================================
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-09-15 13:52 kpfleming Relationship added has duplicate 0015886
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list