[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014340]: [patch] Calls are not matched to correct peer when using callbackextension parameter

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=14340 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                Nick_Lewis
Assigned To:                dvossel
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   14340
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
Asterisk Version:           1.6.1-beta4 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-01-27 04:03 CST
Last Modified:              2009-09-09 16:01 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] Calls are not matched to correct peer when
using callbackextension parameter
Description: 
If there are a number of peers with different callbackextension parameters
the incoming calls are not matched to the right peers

for example with two peers as follows
[trunk1]
host=sip.myitsp.com
callbackextension=9991
...
[trunk2]
host=sip.myitsp.com
callbackextension=9992
...

incoming calls to 9991 and to 9992 are both matched to the peer for 9992
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
duplicate of        0014250 [patch] Incoming calls from registratio...
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0110440) dvossel (administrator) - 2009-09-09 16:01
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=14340#c110440 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I uploaded a patch I made a few days ago.  I've had it up on reviewboard
for a bit, but it may have gotten over looked.  I tried to take the general
idea Nick_Lewis had and implement it without the use of a separate hash
table.  What are your thoughts? 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-09-09 16:01 dvossel        Note Added: 0110440                          
======================================================================