[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0011157]: Asterisk does not send a provisional response at every minute
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Wed Sep 2 19:23:59 CDT 2009
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=11157
======================================================================
Reported By: rjain
Assigned To: twilson
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 11157
Category: Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility: always
Severity: trivial
Priority: normal
Status: closed
Asterisk Version: 1.6.1-beta1
Regression: No
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
Resolution: fixed
Fixed in Version:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2007-11-04 16:29 CST
Last Modified: 2009-09-02 19:23 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: Asterisk does not send a provisional response at
every minute
Description:
The issue here is that Asterisk does not send a non-100 response at every
minute for calls that are in the provisional response state. This causes
most UACs and/or proxies to terminate the call after 3 minutes. There are
many legitimate reasons why a call could remain in an unanswered state for
more than 3 minutes such as early-media (183), call queuing (182), call
forwarding (181) and ringing (180).
Following is quote from section 13.3.1.1 of RFC 3261 which explains what a
UAS should do under such a circumstance:
If the UAS desires an extended period of time to answer the INVITE,
it will need to ask for an "extension" in order to prevent proxies
from canceling the transaction. A proxy has the option of canceling
a transaction when there is a gap of 3 minutes between responses in a
transaction. To prevent cancellation, the UAS MUST send a non-100
provisional response at every minute, to handle the possibility of
lost provisional responses.
This issue was first reported by Alex Balashov on the asterisk-dev mailing
list:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2007-November/030341.html.
I've reproduced this problem and collected wireshark and debug traces,
which are attached to this bug report.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0110095) svnbot (reporter) - 2009-09-02 19:23
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=11157#c110095
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Repository: asterisk
Revision: 215774
_U branches/1.6.1/
U branches/1.6.1/channels/chan_sip.c
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r215774 | twilson | 2009-09-02 19:23:58 -0500 (Wed, 02 Sep 2009) | 32
lines
Merged revisions 215758 via svnmerge from
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk
................
r215758 | twilson | 2009-09-02 18:31:04 -0500 (Wed, 02 Sep 2009) | 25
lines
Merged revisions 215682 via svnmerge from
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4
........
r215682 | twilson | 2009-09-02 16:41:22 -0500 (Wed, 02 Sep 2009) | 18
lines
Re-send non-100 provisional responses to prevent cancellation
From section 13.3.1.1 of RFC 3261:
If the UAS desires an extended period of time to answer the INVITE,
it will need to ask for an "extension" in order to prevent proxies
from canceling the transaction. A proxy has the option of canceling
a transaction when there is a gap of 3 minutes between responses in
a
transaction. To prevent cancellation, the UAS MUST send a non-100
provisional response at every minute, to handle the possibility of
lost provisional responses.
(closes issue https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=11157)
Reported by: rjain
Tested by: twilson
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/315/
........
................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=215774
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-09-02 19:23 svnbot Checkin
2009-09-02 19:23 svnbot Note Added: 0110095
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list