[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0011157]: Asterisk does not send a provisional response at every minute

Asterisk Bug Tracker noreply at bugs.digium.com
Wed Sep 2 18:31:52 CDT 2009


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=11157 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                rjain
Assigned To:                twilson
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   11157
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   trivial
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     closed
Asterisk Version:           1.6.1-beta1 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
Resolution:                 fixed
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2007-11-04 16:29 CST
Last Modified:              2009-09-02 18:31 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Asterisk does not send a provisional response at
every minute
Description: 
The issue here is that Asterisk does not send a non-100 response at every
minute for calls that are in the provisional response state. This causes
most UACs and/or proxies to terminate the call after 3 minutes. There are
many legitimate reasons why a call could remain in an unanswered state for
more than 3 minutes such as early-media (183), call queuing (182), call
forwarding (181) and ringing (180). 

Following is quote from section 13.3.1.1 of RFC 3261 which explains what a
UAS should do under such a circumstance:

   If the UAS desires an extended period of time to answer the INVITE,
   it will need to ask for an "extension" in order to prevent proxies
   from canceling the transaction.  A proxy has the option of canceling
   a transaction when there is a gap of 3 minutes between responses in a
   transaction.  To prevent cancellation, the UAS MUST send a non-100
   provisional response at every minute, to handle the possibility of
   lost provisional responses.

This issue was first reported by Alex Balashov on the asterisk-dev mailing
list:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2007-November/030341.html.
I've reproduced this problem and collected wireshark and debug traces,
which are attached to this bug report.

====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0110090) svnbot (reporter) - 2009-09-02 18:31
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=11157#c110090 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Repository: asterisk
Revision: 215758

_U  trunk/
U   trunk/channels/chan_sip.c

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r215758 | twilson | 2009-09-02 18:31:49 -0500 (Wed, 02 Sep 2009) | 25
lines

Merged revisions 215682 via svnmerge from 
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4

........
  r215682 | twilson | 2009-09-02 16:41:22 -0500 (Wed, 02 Sep 2009) | 18
lines
  
  Re-send non-100 provisional responses to prevent cancellation
  
  From section 13.3.1.1 of RFC 3261:
  
     If the UAS desires an extended period of time to answer the INVITE,
     it will need to ask for an "extension" in order to prevent proxies
     from canceling the transaction. A proxy has the option of canceling
     a transaction when there is a gap of 3 minutes between responses in a
     transaction. To prevent cancellation, the UAS MUST send a non-100
     provisional response at every minute, to handle the possibility of
     lost provisional responses.
  
  (closes issue https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=11157)
  Reported by: rjain
  Tested by: twilson
  
  Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/315/
........

------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=215758 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-09-02 18:31 svnbot         Checkin                                      
2009-09-02 18:31 svnbot         Note Added: 0110090                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list