[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0015758]: Park application expects timeout to be in Milliseconds

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15758 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                mmurdock
Assigned To:                junky
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   15758
Category:                   Features/Parking
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   block
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Target Version:             1.6.1.6
Asterisk Version:           1.6.1.5-rc1 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-08-21 16:22 CDT
Last Modified:              2009-09-02 17:04 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Park application expects timeout to be in
Milliseconds
Description: 
When using the park() application the timeout has to be set in
milliseconds.  It is expected that this be in seconds.

If this is your dialplan:
exten => _7Z,n,Set(PARKINGEXTEN=702)
exten => _7Z,n,Park(60,park-dial,9999,1)

This is what you will see on the console
Parked SIP/1123-b700c008 on 702 (lot default). Will timeout back to
extension [park-dial] 9999, 1 in 0 seconds

If I change it to this:
exten => _7Z,n,Set(PARKINGEXTEN=702)
exten => _7Z,n,Park(60000,park-dial,9999,1)

This is what I see and it does time out in 60 seconds.
== Parked SIP/1135-0910b0a0 on 702 (lot default). Will timeout back to
extension [park-dial] 9999, 1 in 60 seconds
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0110084) junky (manager) - 2009-09-02 17:04
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15758#c110084 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
mmurock: that's not quite true.
Answer() accepts ms and not s.
Wait() accepts s and not s.


I agree with you that all the time should be standardize. To me, ms is a
better option.

seanbright: I think we can only do this if we avoid the standardization.
That will be a cool discussion at astricon! 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-09-02 17:04 junky          Note Added: 0110084                          
======================================================================