[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016010]: Call abort after wrong behaviour of VNAK transmission
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Wed Oct 28 05:16:57 CDT 2009
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16010
======================================================================
Reported By: ffloimair
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 16010
Category: Channels/chan_iax2
Reproducibility: sometimes
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: acknowledged
Asterisk Version: 1.4.26.2
JIRA:
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-10-02 03:22 CDT
Last Modified: 2009-10-28 05:16 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: Call abort after wrong behaviour of VNAK
transmission
Description:
Asterisk sends VNAK to signal a retransmission of a packet. After
retransmission the request is sent again and again... Abort of the call is
the result after a few retries.
Overall, asterisk very often sends VNAK after receiving LAGRQ and PING
consecutively. Why does asterisk know that packet 2 after 1 is missing if
there was no packet 3 so far (numbers referring to ascending sequence
numbers in IAX Header)? This is confusing since the RFC states the below
text requiring to retransmit all frames with a higher sequence number than
the one received with the VNAK.
Please see the attached pcap file.
There was no significant output in the asterisk console, so I do not post
this as of now. If required I can post this later.
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
duplicate of 0016055 Loss of IAX calls after strange VNAK be...
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0112836) dreamer2000 (reporter) - 2009-10-28 05:16
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16010#c112836
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I looked through the pcap file and i think i have 2 ideas for possible
reasons why the calls are dropped after "max tries exceeded...":
1.
one part sends PING (SEQ-ID) and LAGRQ (SEQ-ID+1), after this asterisk
answers with VNAK (SEQ-ID) which looks like a bug at all because of
IAX2-RFC: 6.9.3. VNAK: Voice Negative Acknowledgement Message - you must
repeat frames with a higher seq-id as in VNAK - in case that PING is lost,
the VNAK should say SEQ-ID-1! PING must be the frame that is lost because
otherwise asterisk would not know that one frame is lost after there is no
third packet.
2.
after receiving 2 frames in a row in a very small time slot it seams that
maybe the receiving queue is read out wrong. I do not know how this is
handled - is it FIFO ? or is the queue handled via iax-timestamps? in this
case the two frames have the same timestamp and may be mixed up all the
time until time out error..
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-10-28 05:16 dreamer2000 Note Added: 0112836
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list