[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016056]: Lenth of called number send in enblock
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Mon Oct 12 04:36:26 CDT 2009
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16056
======================================================================
Reported By: jamicque
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 16056
Category: Channels/chan_dahdi
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: new
Asterisk Version: 1.6.1.7-rc2
JIRA:
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-10-12 04:36 CDT
Last Modified: 2009-10-12 04:36 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: Lenth of called number send in enblock
Description:
According to recommendation ETSI ETS 300 102-1 in chapter 4.5.8 there is a
statement that there are 23 octets for called number, where octets from
4-23 are for send digits. According to that numbers longer than 19 should
by send in overlapped mode. Now asterisk sends whole number in one en-block
what is wrong, and in result the other side equipment can reject the ISDN
frame or take only digits from 4 to 23 octet in a frame.
In attachment there is a log where asterisk sends number
123412341234123412341234 in one enblock
======================================================================
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-10-12 04:36 jamicque New Issue
2009-10-12 04:36 jamicque Asterisk Version => 1.6.1.7-rc2
2009-10-12 04:36 jamicque Regression => No
2009-10-12 04:36 jamicque SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball
releases) => N/A
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list