[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0015618]: [patch] Channel not locked when it should in local_attended_transfer

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15618 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                lmsteffan
Assigned To:                dvossel
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   15618
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/Transfers
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   block
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
Target Version:             1.6.3.0
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
JIRA:                        
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  trunk 
SVN Revision (number only!): 209615 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-07-30 18:58 CDT
Last Modified:              2009-10-04 18:27 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] Channel not locked when it should in
local_attended_transfer
Description: 
Right after performing the transfer, the target channel (target.chan1) is
unlocked. It is not locked again before performing the masquerade (although
aa comment says so).

Performing a relock of this channel leads to a deadlock with
&current->chan1. Trying to solve that deadlock led me to a bunch of astobj2
errors.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0111832) lmsteffan (reporter) - 2009-10-04 18:27
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15618#c111832 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
We are currently testing your patch. It seems to work on our test system,
but I'll get back with more information in a few days when we have
performed all the non-regression tests. Thanks for your help! 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-10-04 18:27 lmsteffan      Note Added: 0111832                          
======================================================================