[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016336]: reinvites fail when sdp-session does not increment
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Mon Nov 30 14:33:44 CST 2009
The following issue has been set as DUPLICATE OF issue 0016238.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16336
======================================================================
Reported By: fnordian
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 16336
Category: Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility: have not tried
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: new
Asterisk Version: 1.6.1.10
JIRA:
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): 1.6.1
SVN Revision (number only!): 230432
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-11-27 09:39 CST
Last Modified: 2009-11-30 14:33 CST
======================================================================
Summary: reinvites fail when sdp-session does not increment
Description:
Hi,
revision 227759 introduced a change in asterisk's behavior if sdpversion
in a sip-session does not increment. Before that change, asterisk simply
ignored the sdp in this case. Now, asterisk responds with "488 Not
acceptable here" and the call get's dropped. As some sip-clients have a
problem incrementing the sdp-version in their reinvites, I guess reverting
to the old behavior would be good.
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
duplicate of 0016238 sip calls drop because of BYE's
======================================================================
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-11-30 14:33 lmadsen Relationship added duplicate of 0016238
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list