[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016313]: Responds sendrecv to recvonly SDP, but RFC 3264 says sendonly and inactive are only possible replies

Asterisk Bug Tracker noreply at bugs.digium.com
Mon Nov 23 11:26:24 CST 2009


The following issue has been SUBMITTED. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16313 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                davidw
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   16313
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
JIRA:                        
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!): 230951 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-11-23 11:26 CST
Last Modified:              2009-11-23 11:26 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Responds sendrecv to recvonly SDP, but RFC 3264 says
sendonly and inactive are only possible replies
Description: 
Whilst looking at possible solutions to
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16254, I noticed that Asterisk can
never send a sendonly SDP response.  Moreover it treats an inbound recvonly
as an unrecognized case.  The result is that it sends the default sendrecv
response.

RFC 3624 says that the only acceptable responses to recvonly are sendonly
and inactive.  I.E., reading between the lines, the response cannot offer
more capabilities than the request would allow.
====================================================================== 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-11-23 11:26 davidw         New Issue                                    
2009-11-23 11:26 davidw         Asterisk Version          => SVN             
2009-11-23 11:26 davidw         Regression                => No              
2009-11-23 11:26 davidw         SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball
releases) => N/A             
2009-11-23 11:26 davidw         SVN Revision (number only!) => 230951          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list