[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0015101]: [patch] SIP allowguest defaults to yes with 'make samples'

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

The following issue is now in status NEW (again) 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15101 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                alecdavis
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   15101
Category:                   Core/Configuration
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
JIRA:                        
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!): 192214 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-05-13 17:20 CDT
Last Modified:              2009-11-12 14:54 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] SIP allowguest defaults to yes with 'make
samples'
Description: 
Proposal to change sip.conf.sample and extensions.conf.sample

So that new a install has sip.conf has allowguest=no in the [general]
section
and extensions.conf to have a warning in the [default] section that
sip.conf may have allowguest=yes or the default of yes.


====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0113742) tilghman (administrator) - 2009-11-12 14:54
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15101#c113742 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I think we've now come to an agreement on the asterisk-dev mailing list, in
which we will change the name of the context to "public", to make it more
obvious.  Thank you for starting the discussion.  I believe it has been
rather productive. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-11-12 14:54 tilghman       Note Added: 0113742                          
2009-11-12 14:54 tilghman       Status                   closed => new       
2009-11-12 14:54 tilghman       Resolution               suspended => open   
======================================================================