[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016194]: IAX2 Codec negotiation fails since 227580

Fri Nov 6 09:22:15 CST 2009

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16194 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                habile
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   16194
Category:                   Channels/chan_iax2
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
JIRA:                        
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  trunk 
SVN Revision (number only!): 228233 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-11-06 04:19 CST
Last Modified:              2009-11-06 09:22 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    IAX2 Codec negotiation fails since 227580
Description: 
I get the following on inbound IAX2 calls since 227580.

[Nov  6 10:06:41] NOTICE[26182] chan_iax2.c: Rejected connect attempt from
213.166.5.129, requested/capability '0x8 (alaw)'/'0xefc0000
(h261|h263|h263p|h264|mpeg4|red|t140)' incompatible with our capability
'0xfb3 (g723|gsm|g726|adpcm|lpc10|g729|speex|ilbc|g726aal2)'.
[Nov  6 10:06:44] NOTICE[26177] test_amihooks.c: AMI Event:

These capabilities do not match what I have configured.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0113288) habile (reporter) - 2009-11-06 09:22
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16194#c113288 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Just out of interest, and don't take this the wrong way but it would help
me to understand in the future why this would be classed minor and not
major?