[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0015025]: [patch] Functions INC and DEC
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue May 26 09:38:28 CDT 2009
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15025
======================================================================
Reported By: greenfieldtech
Assigned To: tilghman
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 15025
Category: Functions/func_math
Reproducibility: N/A
Severity: feature
Priority: normal
Status: acknowledged
Asterisk Version: SVN
Regression: No
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): trunk
SVN Revision (number only!): 191919M
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-05-03 20:30 CDT
Last Modified: 2009-05-26 09:38 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Functions INC and DEC
Description:
Over the course of time, developing Asterisk dialplans becomes fairly
cumbersome, especially when writing While() loops in the dialplan. Mainly,
when we want to iterate a few times, the ever annoying Set(Var=$[${Var} +
1]) is really annoying.
INCrement and DECrement follow the old PASCAL functions, allowing to
increment and decrement a variable.
The functions are built to handle both numeric and alpha-numeric values.
If an alpha-numeric value is given, the functions will simply bail out and
issue a LOG_NOTICE accordingly.
In order to implement this, i've added some functionality to func_math.c
and added a new ast_is_numeric function to strings.h
Please find attached patches for TRUNK.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0105416) lmadsen (administrator) - 2009-05-26 09:38
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15025#c105416
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure if this is just a typo, or how you are actually wanting this to
work, but I don't like this format in the dialplan:
exten => _X.,n,While($[DEC(MyVar) > 0])
I'd expect to do:
exten => _X.,n,While($[${DEC(MyVar)} > 0])
The ${DEC(MyVar)} should decrement the number from ${MyVar} and return the
result.
Like I said, this may be exactly how it works now, but could just be a
typo in the dialplan example.
BTW: As someone who does a lot of loops, I like this!
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-05-26 09:38 lmadsen Note Added: 0105416
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list