[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0015001]: [patch] CoreShowChannels Response does not honor actionid

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15001 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                sum
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   15001
Category:                   Core/ManagerInterface
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   trivial
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           1.6.2.0-beta1 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-04-29 20:07 CDT
Last Modified:              2009-05-21 18:59 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] CoreShowChannels Response does not honor
actionid
Description: 
 Response: Success
Eventlist: start
Message: Channels will follow

Channel: SIP/phone-02-00872080
UniqueID: 1241052557.223
Context: from-local
Extension: 1299
Priority: 3
ChannelState: 6
ChannelStateDesc: Up
Application: MusicOnHold
ApplicationData: 
CallerIDnum: 1201
Duration: 00:00:12
AccountCode: 
BridgedChannel: 
BridgedUniqueID: 

Event: CoreShowChannelsComplete
EventList: Complete
ListItems: 1 


ActionID missing.

====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0105270) sum (reporter) - 2009-05-21 18:59
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15001#c105270 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
any comments? is it possible to have this checked in? it's important to any
who is using ami to be able to parse the response the same way that is done
with other responses. Thnks 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-05-21 18:59 sum            Note Added: 0105270                          
======================================================================