[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014385]: Unhold fails if first SDP on OK, particularly Cisco CCM 6
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Thu May 21 10:57:56 CDT 2009
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=14385
======================================================================
Reported By: davidw
Assigned To: file
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 14385
Category: Channels/chan_sip/Interoperability
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: feedback
Asterisk Version: 1.6.0.1
Regression: No
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-02-02 06:39 CST
Last Modified: 2009-05-21 10:57 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: Unhold fails if first SDP on OK, particularly Cisco
CCM 6
Description:
Cisco CCM 6 appears never to send SDP on the INVITE, so Asterisk
effectively makes the offer, even when the Cisco is re-inviting because a
CCM hosted phone has gone on hold. Asterisk sets up its SDP from flags[1]
in the channel private data structure, which means that, if the channel was
on hold, it will offer a=inactive (observed, although a=recvonly also seems
possible). Even if the CCM intended to unhold, the only possible response
to an a=inactive offer, is a=inactive. Asterisk should only actually use
saved state if it is making the response. For an offer, as it looks like
it can never locally hold, it should offer a=sendrecv.
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to 0014448 [patch] chan_sip fails to remove hold w...
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0105223) davidw (reporter) - 2009-05-21 10:57
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=14385#c105223
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't tried that. It would only be for diagnostic purposes as
reinvites are considered critical for our application.
The bad news is that some non-Asterisk work has had its priority raised,
so I may not be able to do much for some time. The good news is that my
employers are now happy to sign the Digium licence, so I should be able to
give you the actual patch that I tried.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-05-21 10:57 davidw Note Added: 0105223
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list