[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0015001]: [patch] CoreShowChannels Response does not honor actionid

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15001 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                sum
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   15001
Category:                   Core/ManagerInterface
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   trivial
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           1.6.2.0-beta1 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-04-29 20:07 CDT
Last Modified:              2009-05-13 18:48 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] CoreShowChannels Response does not honor
actionid
Description: 
 Response: Success
Eventlist: start
Message: Channels will follow

Channel: SIP/phone-02-00872080
UniqueID: 1241052557.223
Context: from-local
Extension: 1299
Priority: 3
ChannelState: 6
ChannelStateDesc: Up
Application: MusicOnHold
ApplicationData: 
CallerIDnum: 1201
Duration: 00:00:12
AccountCode: 
BridgedChannel: 
BridgedUniqueID: 

Event: CoreShowChannelsComplete
EventList: Complete
ListItems: 1 


ActionID missing.

====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0104718) sum (reporter) - 2009-05-13 18:48
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15001#c104718 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I realized that on that function the name is different for the action id so
the patch was wrong, I now tested the new one and uploaded the new
patchactionid2.patch

can you check if this is ok? 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-05-13 18:48 sum            Note Added: 0104718                          
======================================================================