[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014761]: [patch] 1.6.1: unidirectional PCM if (FXS?) hardware DTMF detection enabled

Asterisk Bug Tracker noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue May 12 15:08:20 CDT 2009


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=14761 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                tzafrir
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   14761
Category:                   Channels/chan_dahdi
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Target Version:             1.6.1.1
Asterisk Version:           1.6.1.0-rc3 
Regression:                 Yes 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-03-26 06:26 CDT
Last Modified:              2009-05-12 15:08 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] 1.6.1: unidirectional PCM if (FXS?) hardware
DTMF detection enabled
Description: 
The following is seems to be a regression between 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 . Tested
it locally with Astribanks and also heard it reported with Sangoma A200
cards.

In this case, the caller does not get PCM once the call is established.

Workaround: disable hardwqre DTMF detection in the driver.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0104613) dimas (reporter) - 2009-05-12 15:08
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=14761#c104613 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Yeah, it looks like it could be me.
My patch was tested with software DTMF detection only because I had no
board woth hardware detection available so I missed the logic how
hardware-detected DTMF are processed.


tzafrir, I'm just curious why your patch not just returns the last "else"
but does "unmute" a bit different? I believe "else { zt_confmute(p, 0); }"
should work fine... 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-05-12 15:08 dimas          Note Added: 0104613                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list