[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014913]: limitonpeers=yes vs call-limit=1 didn't work on asterisk 1.4.24

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14913 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                sybasesql
Assigned To:                file
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   14913
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     confirmed
Asterisk Version:           1.4.24 
Regression:                 Yes 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-04-16 12:57 CDT
Last Modified:              2009-05-12 10:55 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    limitonpeers=yes vs call-limit=1 didn't work on
asterisk 1.4.24
Description: 
Hello,

In asterisk 1.4.24 limitonpeers=yes vs call-limit=1 didn't work.

My setup:
[xxxxxxxxxxx]
type=friend
accountcode=xxxxxxxxxxx
username=xxxxxxxxxxx
secret=xxxxxxxxxxx
host=dynamic
qualify=yes
dtmfmode=rfc2833
nat=yes
canreinvite=no
context=xxxxxxxxxxx
callerid="xxxxxxxxxxx" <xxxxxxxxxxx>
usereqphone=yes
call-limit=1
limitonpeers=yes
disallow=all
allow=alaw

Errors:
[Apr 16 21:33:21] ERROR[23739] chan_sip.c: Call from peer 'xxxxxxxxxxx'
rejected due to usage limit of 1
[Apr 16 21:33:21] NOTICE[23739] chan_sip.c: Failed to place call for user
xxxxxxxxxxx, too many calls

Dscription:
User xxxxxxxxxxx accept inbound call and immediate make outbound call
(redirect inbound) through his peer xxxxxxxxxxx, but got error "rejected
due to usage limit of 1".

====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0104596) file (administrator) - 2009-05-12 10:55
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14913#c104596 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I've gone back to 1.4.22, 1.4.20, and 1.4.18. They all behave as the
current version does - they all reject the call as expected. Like I said, I
don't think we are going to be able to come to a solution for 1.4. You
can't have it be combined and separated... 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-05-12 10:55 file           Note Added: 0104596                          
======================================================================