[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0015052]: registration fails if multiple peers are specified in sip.conf

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=15052 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                fsantulli
Assigned To:                lmadsen
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   15052
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/Registration
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   block
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
Asterisk Version:           1.6.1.0 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-05-07 11:07 CDT
Last Modified:              2009-05-11 11:54 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    registration fails if multiple peers are specified
in sip.conf
Description: 
if i use only one register line and only one peer is configured in
sip.conf, registration works okey. If i add a registration line for another
proxy and i add the relative section, asterisk wants to resolve
[section_name] as hostname and registration fails
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0104529) lmadsen (administrator) - 2009-05-11 11:54
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=15052#c104529 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I used your attached file, but added 'externip' and 'localnet' (because I'm
behind NAT).

I then added two users for my digium account, and my unlimitel account.

Both of these registered fine, so I don't quite understand what the
problem is.

I used the [section_name] in the register line like you have in your
example. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-05-11 11:54 lmadsen        Note Added: 0104529                          
======================================================================