[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014011]: [patch] Incorrect jump to extension

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14011 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                dveiga
Assigned To:                file
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   14011
Category:                   Applications/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     closed
Asterisk Version:           1.6.1-beta3 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  trunk 
SVN Revision (number only!): 160441 
Request Review:              
Resolution:                 fixed
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2008-12-02 20:46 CST
Last Modified:              2009-05-07 18:42 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] Incorrect jump to extension
Description: 
When calling Background() application, function pbx_builtin_background() is
called. Inside it, I believe there's a bug when comparing the channel
context with the one used as a parameter. Where it says "if (args.context
!= chan->context && res)" it should say "if ( strcmp(args.context,
chan->context) && res)".
I just explained it because in this simple case I think its easier than
sending a patch, but I can send the patch file if it helps.
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0014940 Background application executed in post...
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0104412) svnbot (reporter) - 2009-05-07 18:42
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14011#c104412 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Repository: asterisk
Revision: 193120

_U  trunk/
U   trunk/main/pbx.c

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r193120 | tilghman | 2009-05-07 18:42:29 -0500 (Thu, 07 May 2009) | 26
lines

Merged revisions 193119 via svnmerge from 
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4

........
  r193119 | tilghman | 2009-05-07 18:41:11 -0500 (Thu, 07 May 2009) | 19
lines
  
  Fix Background within a Macro for FreePBX.
  If the single digit DTMF is an extension in the specified context, then
  go there and signal no DTMF.  Otherwise, we should exit with that DTMF.
  If we're in Macro, we'll exit and seek that DTMF as the beginning of an
  extension in the Macro's calling context.  If we're not in Macro, then
  we'll simply seek that extension in the calling context.  Previously,
  someone complained about the behavior as it related to the interior of a
  Gosub routine, and the fix (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14011)
inadvertently broke FreePBX
  (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14940).  This change should fix both of
these situations, but with the
  possible incompatibility that if a single digit extension does not exist
  (but a longer extension COULD have matched), it would have previously
  gone immediately to the "i" extension, but will now need to wait for a
  timeout.
  (closes issue http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14940)
   Reported by: p_lindheimer
   Patches: 
         20090420__bug14940.diff.txt uploaded by tilghman (license 14)
   Tested by: p_lindheimer
........

------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=193120 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-05-07 18:42 svnbot         Checkin                                      
2009-05-07 18:42 svnbot         Note Added: 0104412                          
======================================================================