[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014424]: [patch] Caller ID is missing for h323 calls.
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Wed Mar 11 15:22:05 CDT 2009
The following issue has been CLOSED
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14424
======================================================================
Reported By: jnaren
Assigned To: jpeeler
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 14424
Category: Channels/chan_h323
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: closed
Target Version: 1.6.0.8
Asterisk Version: 1.6.0.3
Regression: No
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
Resolution: open
Fixed in Version:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-02-06 08:39 CST
Last Modified: 2009-03-11 15:22 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Caller ID is missing for h323 calls.
Description:
Hi I am running
*CLI> core show version
Asterisk 1.6.0.3 built by root @ box on a i686 running Linux on 2009-01-26
17:15:21 UTC
Extensions.conf has
exten => _8.,1,AGI(meta.agi,${EXTEN},${STRFTIME(${EPOCH},,%d-%b-%Y
%H:%M:%S)},${CALLERID(ani)},${CALLERID(ani2)},${CALLERID(all)},${CALLERID(dnid)},${CALLERID(num)},${CALLERID(rdnis)},${CALLERID(num)},${CALLINGANI2}})
When a h323 calls comes in I do not get any callerid passed to the agi as
parameters.
*CLI> -- Executing [888112 at default:1] AGI("H323/ip$MYIP:27863/23707",
"meta.agi,888112,06-Feb-2009 14:28:31,,0,"" <>,888112,,,,0}") in new stack
when a sip call comes in i get the caller id.
Executing [888112 at default:1] AGI("SIP/ASTIP-082593b8",
"meta.agi,888112,06-Feb-2009 14:30:29,2073081111,0,""
<2073081111>,888112,2073081111,,2073081111,0}") in new stack
The calls work fine. No problem in both cases, but the Caller id is
missing for h323 calls.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0101584) jpeeler (administrator) - 2009-03-11 15:22
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14424#c101584
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually, after testing using Asterisk as an authoritative client I don't
think there is any problem here. When testing with Ekiga I thought that
perhaps the h323-ID should have been showing up as the caller number, which
doesn't really make any sense. If the calling party number is not sent in
the Q931 setup message the caller ID number won't show up.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-03-11 15:22 jpeeler Note Added: 0101584
2009-03-11 15:22 jpeeler Status feedback => closed
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list