[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0011231]: [patch] Many retransmits when chan_sip generates multiple outstanding requests
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue Jun 30 13:56:39 CDT 2009
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=11231
======================================================================
Reported By: flefoll
Assigned To: mmichelson
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 11231
Category: Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: closed
Asterisk Version: SVN
Regression: No
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): 1.4
SVN Revision (number only!): 89184
Request Review:
Resolution: fixed
Fixed in Version:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2007-11-13 08:08 CST
Last Modified: 2009-06-30 13:56 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Many retransmits when chan_sip generates
multiple outstanding requests
Description:
I opened issue 10946 in october http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10946 on
the same subject, but it was closed last week, together with issue 9567 and
issue 10915 (sorry, I was away last week).
All 3 issues were closed when chan_skip rev 89097 was committed. This
revision adds support for one outgoing transaction with the new
"lastnoninvite" field.
So, I have given a try to modification brought by chan_skip rev 89097. But
it does not solve the retransmit problem for me.
Typically, try with a series of SendText(ABC) in your extensions.conf :
the SIP peer will never respond quickly enough, and all (except last)
MESSAGE messages will be retransmitted. Silly test, but easy to reproduce
!
The problem also most probably still occurs when REFER handling provokes
too many and too quick NOTIFY messages (not re-tried yet, but new
"lastnoninvite" can handle one NOTIFY only).
Consequently, I propose another patch : this one won't remove code :-) but
it will add a few more lines instead, in order to cancel retransmits when
chan_sip receives a "late" response.
I know, it does not respond to file's dream of "a chan_sip with real
transaction support" :-)
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to 0010915 Problems when doing an attended and una...
has duplicate 0014547 [patch] Resending CANCEL doesn't stop
related to 0010052 NOTIFY race condition when state change...
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0107250) svnbot (reporter) - 2009-06-30 13:56
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=11231#c107250
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Repository: asterisk
Revision: 204247
_U trunk/
U trunk/channels/chan_sip.c
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r204247 | mmichelson | 2009-06-29 16:48:54 -0500 (Mon, 29 Jun 2009) | 34
lines
Merged revisions 204243,204246 via svnmerge from
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4
........
r204243 | mmichelson | 2009-06-29 16:23:43 -0500 (Mon, 29 Jun 2009) | 22
lines
Fix a problem where chan_sip would ignore "old" but valid responses.
chan_sip has had a problem for quite a long time that would manifest
when
Asterisk would send multiple SIP responses on the same dialog before
receiving
a response. The problem occurred because chan_sip only kept track of the
highest
outgoing sequence number used on the dialog. If Asterisk sent two
requests out,
and a response arrived for the first request sent, then Asterisk would
ignore
the response. The result was that Asterisk would continue retransmitting
the
requests and ignoring the responses until the maximum number of
retransmissions
had been reached.
The fix here is to rearrange the code a bit so that instead of simply
comparing
the sequence number of the response to our latest outgoing sequence
number, we
walk our list of outstanding packets and determine if there is a match.
If there is,
we continue. If not, then we ignore the response.
In doing this, I found a few completely useless variables that I have
now removed.
(closes issue https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=11231)
Reported by: flefoll
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/298
........
r204246 | mmichelson | 2009-06-29 16:37:05 -0500 (Mon, 29 Jun 2009) | 3
lines
Fix build oops.
........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=204247
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-06-30 13:56 svnbot Checkin
2009-06-30 13:56 svnbot Note Added: 0107250
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list