[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0015346]: [patch] TW is not an ISO Language Code

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15346 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                volivier
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   15346
Category:                   Core/Internationalization
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     ready for testing
Asterisk Version:           1.6.1.0 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  trunk 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-06-17 16:49 CDT
Last Modified:              2009-06-29 13:58 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] TW is not an ISO Language Code
Description: 
Tawanese actually is standard mandarin chinese that is categorized as
"zh-tw" or simply "zh" and NEVER "tw". Should simply be "zh" in Asterisk
because Asterisk is not concerned with the actual script of a locale (the
way it is written).

The reason why setting taiwanese as "tw" is a problem, is because it
fragments the efforts to localize in the standard mandarin chinese language
(which is coded as "zh") and is a bad internationalization practice
altogether.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0107150) volivier (reporter) - 2009-06-29 13:58
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15346#c107150 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I agree that our discussion goes beyond the simple issue here. And I agree
with the "tw" to "zh" patches as they were submitted. Can you tell us where
it would be more appropriate to discuss broader G11N issues? Thanks! 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-06-29 13:58 volivier       Note Added: 0107150                          
======================================================================