[asterisk-bugs] [LibPRI 0013055]: [patch] encode and decode Low Layer Compatibility

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=13055 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                klaus3000
Assigned To:                tilghman
====================================================================== 
Project:                    LibPRI
Issue ID:                   13055
Category:                   New/Feature
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
Asterisk Version:           1.4.21 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2008-07-10 11:59 CDT
Last Modified:              2009-06-29 03:32 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] encode and decode Low Layer Compatibility
Description: 
Hi!

This patch adds support for encoding and decoding of the low layer
comaptibility IE.
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0010217 [patch] proper user information layer 1...
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0107114) klaus3000 (reporter) - 2009-06-29 03:32
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=13055#c107114 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Ok. This makes it clearly that if for example UL1 is present in BC and LLC,
its value must be the same. But if UL1 is for example only present in LCC,
but not in BC - is this a contradiction?

I only know that I once hat the problem with H324M in UL1 in BC. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-06-29 03:32 klaus3000      Note Added: 0107114                          
======================================================================