[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014383]: priexclusive parameter ignored if pri = pri_cpe ?
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Fri Jun 26 16:29:25 CDT 2009
The following issue has been ASSIGNED.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=14383
======================================================================
Reported By: mbrancaleoni
Assigned To: rmudgett
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 14383
Category: Channels/chan_dahdi
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: assigned
Asterisk Version: 1.4.23
Regression: No
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-02-02 04:16 CST
Last Modified: 2009-06-26 16:29 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: priexclusive parameter ignored if pri = pri_cpe ?
Description:
Hi,
there's a special reason why the priexclusive param is used only if the
pri is pri_net ?
Looking to this snippet of code (both in chan_zap and chan_dahdi):
**************************
/* Add support for exclusive override */
if (p->priexclusive)
exclusive = 1;
else {
/* otherwise, traditional behavior */
if (p->pri->nodetype == PRI_NETWORK)
exclusive = 0;
else
exclusive = 1;
}
**************************
Seems that the exclusive is always true if the pri is PRI_CPE ?
There's a special reason for that?
Many telcos requires that the channel selection on CPE side must NOT be
exclusive...
I don't know if there's some drawback into setting exclusive = 0 even when
PRI_CPE is selected.
======================================================================
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-06-26 16:29 jpeeler Assigned To jpeeler => rmudgett
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list