[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0015202]: Parsing of register statements in sip.conf fails when transport is used without extension

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15202 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                okrief
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   15202
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/Registration
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:           1.6.1.0 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-05-27 01:31 CDT
Last Modified:              2009-06-16 16:56 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Parsing of register statements in sip.conf fails
when transport is used without extension
Description: 
In sip.conf, next line works ok
register => trunk4ipbx:passtrunk4ipbx @192.168.100.129

Replacing the above line with the one bellow, produces error message
printed below
register => udp: //trunk4ipbx:passtrunk4ipbx @192.168.100.129

May 26 17:58:42] NOTICE[2859]: chan_sip.c:20169 sip_parse_host: '/' is not
a valid port number on line 25 of sip.conf. using default.
[May 26 17:58:42] WARNING[2859]: chan_sip.c:6560 sip_register: Format for
registration is [transport
://]user[:secret[:authuser]]@domain[:port][/extension][~expiry] at line 25
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0106523) lmadsen (administrator) - 2009-06-16 16:56
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15202#c106523 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I didn't attempt to reproduce the issue. Are you getting this on the latest
1.6.1 branch? I know Tilghman put in a change very recently with regards to
how the register line was parsed. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-06-16 16:56 lmadsen        Note Added: 0106523                          
======================================================================