[asterisk-bugs] [DAHDI-linux 0015251]: [patch] A little more quick and dirty way to build OSLEC

Asterisk Bug Tracker noreply at bugs.digium.com
Sat Jun 6 14:55:28 CDT 2009


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15251 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                biohumanoid
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    DAHDI-linux
Issue ID:                   15251
Category:                   General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   tweak
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-06-02 05:55 CDT
Last Modified:              2009-06-06 14:55 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] A little more quick and dirty way to build
OSLEC
Description: 
Current way isn't so simple... You have to manually build echo.ko

====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0106080) tzafrir (manager) - 2009-06-06 14:55
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15251#c106080 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
And this assumes you actually have drivers/staging/echo ?

Hmm.. maybe make it build so if those files are present. Look at
drivers/dahdi/xpp/Kbuild for ugly inspiration (the way it checks in a very
ugly way if a certain patch was applied - BRISTUFF) 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-06-06 14:55 tzafrir        Note Added: 0106080                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list