[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0015057]: [patch] hints with 2+ devices that include ONHOLD are often set wrong
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Thu Jun 4 10:26:15 CDT 2009
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15057
======================================================================
Reported By: p_lindheimer
Assigned To: dvossel
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 15057
Category: Core/PBX
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: ready for testing
Asterisk Version: 1.4.21.1
Regression: No
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-05-07 21:25 CDT
Last Modified: 2009-06-04 10:26 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] hints with 2+ devices that include ONHOLD
are often set wrong
Description:
I brought this up in the dev mailing list, the crux of the issue is:
If you have a hint with two (or more) devices or a device and a custom
devstate that includes ONHOLD, you get unexpected results. Two examples:
exten => 222,hint,SIP/222&SIP/211
exten => 333,hint,Custom:DND333&SIP/333
The following results are inconsistent as they should all return ONHOLD:
ONHOLD & IDLE = IDLE
ONHOLD & UNAVAILABLE => UNAVAILABLE
ONHOLD & UNKNOWN => IDLE
ONHOLD & INVALID => IDLE
Per Russell Bryant's response on the mailing list:
"I would agree that this is a bug. I would expect that combination of
states to result in an OnHold state."
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0105987) p_lindheimer (reporter) - 2009-06-04 10:26
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15057#c105987
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what's the status on this, looked like it got some testing (or at least
feedback) from some comments in the code reviews?
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-06-04 10:26 p_lindheimer Note Added: 0105987
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list