[asterisk-bugs] [DAHDI-linux 0015311]: [patch] Call to a FXS DAHDI channel with Panasonic KX-TG4000 connected drops in 8 seconds randomly

Asterisk Bug Tracker noreply at bugs.digium.com
Thu Jul 30 14:25:02 CDT 2009


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15311 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                vmikhelson
Assigned To:                dbailey
====================================================================== 
Project:                    DAHDI-linux
Issue ID:                   15311
Category:                   dahdi (the module)
Reproducibility:            random
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-06-11 00:49 CDT
Last Modified:              2009-07-30 14:25 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] Call to a FXS DAHDI channel with Panasonic
KX-TG4000 connected drops in 8 seconds randomly
Description: 
More often than not a call placed to a DAHDI channel with Panasonic
KX-TG4000 connected would drop on its own in exactly 8 seconds after being
answered. Before being disconnected two (2) clicks are being heard in
succession. The second click kills the connection.
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
child of            0015352 [patch] Click heard 6 seconds after ans...
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0108407) dbailey (administrator) - 2009-07-30 14:25
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15311#c108407 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Is this only a 2.1.0.4 issue?  

Looking in the trunk version of the wctdm_proslic_check_hook function, I
do not see the setting of proslic register 64 as implemented in the patch
here.  If we do add it, it will need to take into account the line reversal
MWI that was added in January. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-07-30 14:25 dbailey        Note Added: 0108407                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list