[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0013405]: [patch] T38 gateway
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Wed Jul 22 12:09:39 CDT 2009
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=13405
======================================================================
Reported By: dafe_von_cetin
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 13405
Category: Applications/app_fax
Reproducibility: N/A
Severity: feature
Priority: normal
Status: confirmed
Target Version: 1.6.4.0
Asterisk Version: SVN
Regression: No
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): trunk
SVN Revision (number only!): 140548
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2008-08-30 16:44 CDT
Last Modified: 2009-07-22 12:09 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] T38 gateway
Description:
Hi all,
I'm sending you patch containing new application app_faxgateway.c
("FaxGateway") which is able to mediate T30 to T38 and vice versa.
Feature is using spands library (I used spandsp-0.0.4pre18 and
spandsp-0.0.5pre4).
Best regards
Daniel.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0108086) dimas (reporter) - 2009-07-22 12:09
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=13405#c108086
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. JFYI, the semantics of T38 related control frames in Asterisk have
changed significantly recently so any code using these needs to be updated
appropriately. Take a look at recent changes to chan_sip and app_fax to
get in idea.
2. IIRC there was some work on new bridging API for asterisk. There are
different types of bridges available (like one-to-one or one-to-many). To
me it looks like the T38 fax gateway is just a special type of bridge, not
a separate application.
It is just my thought but I'm thinking about the scenario:
1. at some point Asterisk bridges channels A and B
2. Later asterisk receives T38 request on channel A
3. Asterisk determines it can not pass this request to channel B because B
reports it does not support T38 at all.
4. At this point Asterisk decides to temporary replace current A-B channel
bridge with T38 gateway bridge.
5. new bridge does the conversion of T38 to audio (or back)
Well, it may sound weird. Probably it is weird :) But it definitely worth
researching IMHO. This Asterisk will be doing translation transparenyly...
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-07-22 12:09 dimas Note Added: 0108086
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list