[asterisk-bugs] [DAHDI-linux 0015468]: Dahdi Development Tools have incorrect headers
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Wed Jul 8 13:19:11 CDT 2009
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15468
======================================================================
Reported By: bestbill
Assigned To: sruffell
======================================================================
Project: DAHDI-linux
Issue ID: 15468
Category: dahdi (the module)
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: feedback
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-07-08 12:07 CDT
Last Modified: 2009-07-08 13:19 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: Dahdi Development Tools have incorrect headers
Description:
When Trying to build the Rhino RCB4FXO card driver (rcbfx.ko),
using CentOS 5 with the AsteriskNow Release 1.5.0-i386.
It failed with many errors and warnings.
I had to remove dahdi-linux.i386, dahdi-linux-devel.i386,
dahdi-linux-kmod-base.i686, dahdi-tools.i386, kmod-dahdi-linux.i686
and download dahdi-linux-complete-2.1.0.4+2.1.0.2.tar.gz and make all &&
make install && make config to replace the files in /usr/include/dahdi.
The kernel.h file was trying to include 2 files that where missing:
/usr/include/dahdi/kernel.h:39:26: error: dahdi_config.h: No such file
or directory
/usr/include/dahdi/kernel.h:99:19: error: ecdis.h: No such file or
directory
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0107488) jfinstrom (reporter) - 2009-07-08 13:19
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15468#c107488
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I posted a quick note to Qwell in IRC. I am not sure this is with dahdi but
with the -revel package in AsteriskNOW. Our robot builds fine but it is
source based so in source it should be all good. on a packaged system it is
up to the .h files included by the packager... I think Qwell is reviewing
this in his spec file
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-07-08 13:19 jfinstrom Note Added: 0107488
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list