[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014331]: reg->username is parsed for each registration refresh rather than once on sip reload

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14331 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                Nick_Lewis
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   14331
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/Registration
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   tweak
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           1.6.1-beta4 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-01-26 06:19 CST
Last Modified:              2009-01-26 08:05 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    reg->username is parsed for each registration
refresh rather than once on sip reload
Description: 
The registration string can contain an expanded user portion of the form
user at domain (and possibly user at domain:domainport). This expanded user
portion is currently stored in reg->username and parsed each time there is
a registration refresh. It would be better if the configuration was parsed
only once and the sip_registry structure contained the atomic fields
separately through the addition of, for example, reg->regdomain and
reg->regdomainport elements
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0098745) Nick_Lewis (reporter) - 2009-01-26 08:05
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14331#c98745 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I know what you mean - a domain does not have a port. The problem is that
the registrar does have a port. In the current implementation the domain
info is used not only in the AOR (to/from headers) but also for the
Registrar (request line) hence the need to have a "domainport" 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-01-26 08:05 Nick_Lewis     Note Added: 0098745                          
======================================================================