[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014276]: [patch] allow storage of vmsecret in users voicemail spool directory

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14276 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                klaus3000
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   14276
Category:                   Applications/app_voicemail/NewFeature
Reproducibility:            have not tried
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!): 169203 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-01-19 09:33 CST
Last Modified:              2009-01-19 15:23 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] allow storage of vmsecret in users voicemail
spool directory
Description: 
When secretinspool=yes in voicemail.conf, voicemail reads and writes the
secret into a file in the users voicemail spool directory. For example if
voicemail is configured for user 1234 in voicemail context foobar, then the
secret will be stored in /var/spool/asterisk/voicemail/foobar/1234/secret.

When secretinspool=no, it uses the old behavior and stores secrets into
the configuration files.

Note: realtime voiceboxes are never influenced by this parameter
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0098153) jamesgolovich (manager) - 2009-01-19 15:23
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14276#c98153 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I like the idea of this.  I've reviewed the code and tested it out and it
works as expected 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-01-19 15:23 jamesgolovich  Note Added: 0098153                          
======================================================================