[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014248]: Add Contact field to sip show registry

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14248 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                Nick_Lewis
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   14248
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/Registration
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   feature
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     ready for testing
Asterisk Version:           1.6.0 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-01-15 04:15 CST
Last Modified:              2009-01-15 08:06 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Add Contact field to sip show registry
Description: 
Currently the contact field is not shown on the registry display. It would
be useful if it were included in the response to the sip show registry cli
command. It is often more readily informative than the username or host.

The contact field is also known as r->callback and is derived from the
/contact portion of the registration string.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0097893) Nick_Lewis (reporter) - 2009-01-15 08:06
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14248#c97893 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Many thanks oej I will give it a go.

(I see that my robot needs to be a bit brighter when getting the
registration status. At the moment it assumes the column number so it was
broken by dnsmgr and now by Exten)

Since it affects the same lines of code is there any chance issue 14247
could be rolled up too? 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-01-15 08:06 Nick_Lewis     Note Added: 0097893                          
======================================================================