[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014230]: [patch] Calls are not accepted from an outbound proxy
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Thu Jan 15 07:44:33 CST 2009
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14230
======================================================================
Reported By: Nick_Lewis
Assigned To: putnopvut
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 14230
Category: Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility: have not tried
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: assigned
Asterisk Version: 1.6.0
Regression: No
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-01-13 10:19 CST
Last Modified: 2009-01-15 07:44 CST
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Calls are not accepted from an outbound
proxy
Description:
find_peer does not make a match between a received invite and a peer if the
invite comes from the outboundproxy rather than directly from the host.
For example if a peer has the following sip.conf:
[mytrunk]
host=sip.myitsp.net
port=5060
outboundproxy=nat.myitsp.net:5082
an invite from nat.myitsp.net:5082 is not matched to peer mytrunk
This is a problem for applications in which a natproxy is used for both
incoming and outgoing calls.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0097887) Nick_Lewis (reporter) - 2009-01-15 07:44
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14230#c97887
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This issue is not to do with account-level separation but to do with
getting an IP match so as to accept any call from an ITSP that is using a
natproxy. I was querying your "separated in dialplan" comment because I was
not sure that I understood the relevance to this issue. Now I am satisfied
that the comment is not relevant to this issue.
Ok I have offered the natproxy patch - it is on record for anyone
interested - I have not been persuasive as to its benefits so I guess the
issue is closed
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-01-15 07:44 Nick_Lewis Note Added: 0097887
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list