[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014237]: Similar to 0013884 but different version - chan_iax2 flood with 'No private structure for packet'
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Wed Jan 14 12:30:41 CST 2009
The following issue has been UPDATED.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14237
======================================================================
Reported By: raasdnil
Assigned To: qwell
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 14237
Category: Channels/chan_iax2
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: closed
Asterisk Version: 1.6.0
Regression: No
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Disclaimer on File?: N/A
Request Review:
Resolution: duplicate
Duplicate: 13884
Fixed in Version:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-01-14 05:31 CST
Last Modified: 2009-01-14 12:30 CST
======================================================================
Summary: Similar to 0013884 but different version - chan_iax2
flood with 'No private structure for packet'
Description:
I am having the same problem as ticket 0013884 but on Asterisk 1.6.0, not
on 1.4.22.
I am not sure if the chan_iax2 will apply cleanly to 1.6 or not.
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
duplicate of 0013884 chan_iax2 flood with 'No private struct...
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0097751) qwell (administrator) - 2009-01-14 12:30
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14237#c97751
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a duplicate of http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13884, as pointed out
by the reporter.
Please make any comments you have there, instead of creating a new bug
report.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-01-14 12:30 qwell Note Added: 0097751
2009-01-14 12:30 qwell Relationship added duplicate of 0013884
2009-01-14 12:30 qwell Duplicate ID 0 => 13884
2009-01-14 12:30 qwell Status new => resolved
2009-01-14 12:30 qwell Resolution open => duplicate
2009-01-14 12:30 qwell Assigned To => qwell
2009-01-14 12:30 qwell Status resolved => closed
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list