[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014192]: upgrading from asterisk-1.6.0.3 to branch/asterisk-1.6.1 breaks qualify for TCP peer

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14192 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                pabelanger
Assigned To:                otherwiseguy
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   14192
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     acknowledged
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): 1.6.1 
SVN Revision (number only!): 167502 
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-01-07 15:53 CST
Last Modified:              2009-01-12 23:03 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    upgrading from asterisk-1.6.0.3 to
branch/asterisk-1.6.1 breaks qualify for TCP peer
Description: 
We are in the process of testing the 1.6.1 branch, so we can upgrade a few
sites, but qualify on TCP sip peers appears to be broken now.

Using the same working .configs from asterisk-1.6.0.3, no longer work
using asterisk-1.6.1.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0097560) jamesgolovich (manager) - 2009-01-12 23:03
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14192#c97560 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Give this patch a try, should solve the problem, any TCP client would have
been broken since revision 151101


Note to self:  I need to talk to kpfleming on this to see if he thinks we
need both a old_local_address and a old_remote_address, or if just a
old_address is fine (like what is in the patch). 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-01-12 23:03 jamesgolovich  Note Added: 0097560                          
======================================================================