[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014505]: Resolve remaining issues left over from 'kill-the-user'
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Thu Feb 19 09:04:46 CST 2009
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14505
======================================================================
Reported By: blitzrage
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 14505
Category: Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility: N/A
Severity: block
Priority: high
Status: new
Target Version: 1.6.1
Asterisk Version: 1.6.1-rc1
Regression: No
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-02-19 08:42 CST
Last Modified: 2009-02-19 09:04 CST
======================================================================
Summary: Resolve remaining issues left over from
'kill-the-user'
Description:
(From Russell Bryant to the asterisk-dev mailing list)
Greetings,
It's getting to the point that Asterisk 1.6.1 is nearing release. I'd
like to cover what we have left to address before Asterisk 1.6.1 can be
released.
First, the following page shows what mantis issues are marked as
blocking the release of 1.6.1. Currently, merging some updates to the
timing API is the only thing on this list.
http://bugs.digium.com/roadmap_page.php
The other big thing on my list is to ensure that we are happy with the
state of the chan_sip user/peer/friend situation. Oej's kill-the-user
patch went in for this release. Some issues came up, and a number of
issues have already been fixed. We need to determine if there is
anything left to do in this area before 1.6.1.
Oej has written a document that describes how user/peer/friend matching
should work here:
http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/team/oej/sip-compliance/sipobjects.txt?view=markup
I think that what is written here sounds good to me. Does anyone else
have any comments? Also, do we have code to write to get this to be the
reality in the 1.6.1 code base?
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0100366) blitzrage (administrator) - 2009-02-19 09:04
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14505#c100366
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've just reviewed the document, and it seems pretty straight forward to me
and makes sense. I have nothing additional to add.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-02-19 09:04 blitzrage Note Added: 0100366
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list