[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014444]: M() Docs

Asterisk Bug Tracker noreply at bugs.digium.com
Mon Feb 16 16:22:15 CST 2009


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14444 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                ewieling
Assigned To:                blitzrage
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   14444
Category:                   Applications/app_dial
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   text
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     acknowledged
Asterisk Version:           1.6.0.5 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-02-09 17:11 CST
Last Modified:              2009-02-16 16:22 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    M() Docs
Description: 
(5:08:00 PM) ManxPower: Documentation suggestion:  In the docs for Dial,
them M() option, it would be helpful to mention that if the callee presses
ANY DTMF, the caller will be connected and nothing in the macro will
process the DTMF (like trying to get an extension)
(5:08:14 PM) ManxPower: It would help people avoid wasted hours like the
one I just had.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0100205) putnopvut (administrator) - 2009-02-16 16:22
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14444#c100205 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I've uploaded the changes I recommended last week. ewieling, would such
documentation changes be sufficient?

The actual patch I uploaded is actually for 1.4 and not 1.6.0. The reason
for this is that this lack of documentation applies just as much to 1.4 as
it does to 1.6.0. I have to start the merge process with 1.4, so it makes
sense for me to write the patch against it. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-02-16 16:22 putnopvut      Note Added: 0100205                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list