[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016440]: Setting a call-forward on an analog phone results in the analog phone still being rung when dialed

Asterisk Bug Tracker noreply at bugs.digium.com
Mon Dec 14 11:04:52 CST 2009


The following issue has been UPDATED. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16440 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                mmichelson
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   16440
Category:                   Channels/chan_dahdi
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
JIRA:                        
Regression:                 Yes 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  trunk 
SVN Revision (number only!): 234614 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-12-14 10:50 CST
Last Modified:              2009-12-14 11:04 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Setting a call-forward on an analog phone results in
the analog phone still being rung when dialed
Description: 
If I press *72 to set a call-forward on an analog phone, the processs
appears to work just fine. I press *72, here a stutter dial tone, press an
extension, and see a message appear on the Asterisk console that calls to
the analog phone will be forwarded to the extension I just dialled.

In 1.4 and 1.6.2 rev 234575, attempting to dial the analog phone results
in the call being forwarded to the appropriate extension. In trunk,
however, the analog phone is still rung and the call is never forwarded to
the appropriate extension.

I would provide more information but since this is easily reproducible, I
don't think it is necessary to do so. Feel free to ask me to test whatever
fix may be written. Unfortunately, with the rest of my Asterisk work that I
need to do, someone else will need to look into the code to find out why
this is happening.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0115204) mmichelson (administrator) - 2009-12-14 11:04
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16440#c115204 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Marked this as being a regression. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-12-14 11:04 mmichelson     Regression               No => Yes           
2009-12-14 11:04 mmichelson     Note Added: 0115204                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list