[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016319]: [patch] When using 'joinempty=strict', "in use" devices not seen as "unavailable".

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

The following issue has been UPDATED. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16319 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                jiddings
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   16319
Category:                   Applications/app_queue
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   tweak
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     closed
Asterisk Version:           1.4.27 
JIRA:                        
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
Resolution:                 fixed
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-11-24 17:19 CST
Last Modified:              2009-12-01 12:39 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] When using 'joinempty=strict', "in use"
devices not seen as "unavailable".
Description: 
This may not be a bug, but rather just a misunderstanding of the concept of
what 'unavailable' means, however..

When an agent was on another call (in use) but using joinempty=strict, the
caller was able to join the queue. My layman interpretation of unavailable
would be unable to accept a call, regardless of their status -- invalid,
unavailable, paused, or in use. 
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0114462) lmadsen (administrator) - 2009-12-01 12:39
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16319#c114462 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
This functionality seems to exist in later versions of Asterisk. Yes, it is
feasible to backport this, but this is not the appropriate forum for that
request. Issue closed. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-12-01 12:39 lmadsen        Note Added: 0114462                          
2009-12-01 12:39 lmadsen        Status                   new => closed       
2009-12-01 12:39 lmadsen        Resolution               open => fixed       
======================================================================