[asterisk-bugs] [DAHDI-linux 0014577]: [patch] FXO channels "hookstate" incorrect on startup
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Wed Aug 19 17:15:11 CDT 2009
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=14577
======================================================================
Reported By: jkroon
Assigned To: sruffell
======================================================================
Project: DAHDI-linux
Issue ID: 14577
Category: dahdi (the module)
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: confirmed
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-03-01 16:16 CST
Last Modified: 2009-08-19 17:15 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] FXO channels "hookstate" incorrect on
startup
Description:
Referencing bug 13786 (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13786) which
attempts to work around an underlying problem in userspace (chan_dahdi).
The issue seems to be (as described by tzafrir):
It seems to expose a bug(?) in zaptel/dahdi where chan->rxhooksig is set
to RX_HOOKSIG_INITIAL at the end of chanconfig() which leaves the channel's
state there "uninitialized" and even if the channel driver knows better it
cannot override this decision. But I'm not sure what's the intended
behaviour, so I avoid a seperate bug report on that for now.
This is manifested in that I cannot make outbound calls on an FXO card
(Using FXSKS signalling) until I've received an incoming call resetting the
hookstate to offhook (A single ring is good enough), or alternatively,
disconnecting and reconnecting the telephone line.
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
has duplicate 0015429 After the system reboot calls do not go...
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0109302) tzafrir (manager) - 2009-08-19 17:15
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=14577#c109302
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I still don't understand what is the point of this code in Asterisk.
Why is this test not needed in the case of LS signalling?
Can anybody please explain why this was made a default build option all of
a sudden?
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-08-19 17:15 tzafrir Note Added: 0109302
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list