[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014660]: [patch] Lost info in CDR when transfering call via AMI's Redirect

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=14660 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                caspy
Assigned To:                mnicholson
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   14660
Category:                   CDR/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:           1.6.0.6 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-03-13 09:11 CDT
Last Modified:              2009-08-17 12:00 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] Lost info in CDR when transfering call via
AMI's Redirect
Description: 
- SIP/1344 call SIP/1340
- SIP/1340 answers, and they are speaking
- man-in-a-middle do a Redirect of SIP/1344 leg of this call to SIP/1341
- SIP/1341 answers, and 1344 speaks with 1341 successfuly.

The probles is in CDR.
For the first call (1344 to 1340) asterisk lost just all important
fields:


"","","s","fromoffice","","SIP/1340-08c6dce8","","","","2009-03-13
16:37:44","2009-03-13 16:37:47","2009-03-13
16:37:54",10,7,"ANSWERED","DOCUMENTATION","1236951464.550476",""

"","1344","1341","fromoffice","""Akzhan Test""
<1344>","SIP/1344-b4b3e758","SIP/1341-b51deec0","Dial","SIP/1341,60,twTWL(5400000)","2009-03-13
16:37:44","2009-03-13 16:38:00","2009-03-13
16:38:05",21,5,"ANSWERED","DOCUMENTATION","1236951464.550474",""


Also, mention that uniqueid is very strange: first part (time) is the
same, but second is decreesed for two. Why?
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0109144) mnicholson (administrator) - 2009-08-17 12:00
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=14660#c109144 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I am not sure.  I have not set up this scenario in my lab yet.  I plan to
do it later today, although it may get pushed back to tomorrow. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-08-17 12:00 mnicholson     Note Added: 0109144                          
======================================================================