[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014769]: [patch] Improvements/fixes for app_fax
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Fri Apr 3 19:28:45 CDT 2009
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14769
======================================================================
Reported By: andrew
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 14769
Category: Applications/app_fax
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: ready for review
Asterisk Version: SVN
Regression: No
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): trunk
SVN Revision (number only!): 184382
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-03-26 15:14 CDT
Last Modified: 2009-04-03 19:28 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Improvements/fixes for app_fax
Description:
I was working on a backport of app_fax to asterisk 1.4 branch.
It works great now, but the original code was causing errors to be logged
(a new issue as of 1.4.24, see bug id http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14723).
As I looked into the code
more I found what I think a problems/bugs. Here is a patch (for 1.6 trunk)
for my "improvements/fixes".
I'm using SPANDSP 0.0.6pre7 and testing with SIP using an external PSTN
gateway (AS5300). I can send a fax from the system to the same system
(using the PSTN), so it seems happy. I also tested with a normal fax
machine. RX works way better than TX for me.
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to 0014812 ast_read() used with incorrect ast_wait...
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0102729) dimas (reporter) - 2009-04-03 19:28
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14769#c102729
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. I believe that at the time I made app_fax, the ast_read used too return
AST_FRAME_NULL without producing any warnings even when wait_for ended with
timeout. This is why the code was organized the way it was orgenized.
2. Anyway, my understanding was that I HAD TO call
t38_terminal_send_timeout periodically even if no frames were received. I
thought that it is important for SpanDSP to be called periodically in order
to update some internal state and probably call t38_tx_packet_handler
callback which sends frames to the remote side.
I still think it is true. Because of this I do not think your fix for the
T38 part is correct.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2009-04-03 19:28 dimas Note Added: 0102729
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list