[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0013467]: Seg fault 1.6.0 trunk

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13467 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                edantie
Assigned To:                murf
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   13467
Category:                   CDR/General
Reproducibility:            sometimes
Severity:                   crash
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  trunk 
SVN Revision (number only!): 142733 
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2008-09-12 04:38 CDT
Last Modified:              2008-09-16 15:43 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Seg fault 1.6.0 trunk
Description: 
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=0  0x0000000000446ed3 in ast_cdr_start
(cdr=0x4a0) at cdr.c:680
680			if (!ast_test_flag(cdr, AST_CDR_FLAG_LOCKED)) {

====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0092585) murf (administrator) - 2008-09-16 15:43
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13467#c92585 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
OK, I've gone thru my scenario list and fairly quickly found one that
caused a crash; I traced it from one end to the other and it was pretty
interesting.

I looked at from all sorts of angles, and came up with the patch I
attached. Please, test quickly, I want to keep down the number of bugs
reported against this.

I've personally tested it against polycom430 set to fwd to another exten,
blind xfer (via dahdi hookflash), blind xfer via #-key; attended dahdi xfer
via 3-way;
with the caller doing the xfer, and the callee doing the xfer; sip blind
xfer via the phone button, etc, and all seem to survive. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2008-09-16 15:43 murf           Note Added: 0092585                          
======================================================================